<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for buckdata - news and views for an unquiet age</title>
	<atom:link href="http://buckdata.com/hp_wordpress/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://buckdata.com/hp_wordpress</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 00:33:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Oil Spills and Mine Disasters? by Iris</title>
		<link>http://buckdata.com/hp_wordpress/archives/227/comment-page-1#comment-391</link>
		<dc:creator>Iris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 00:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buckdata.com/hp_wordpress/?p=227#comment-391</guid>
		<description>I agree - we need some alternative for power generation.  However, there is that creepy feeling that the next suggestion will be more nuclear plants.  Hopefully not.  
On a lighter note - I heard that Rush Limbaugh said that the ocean will take care of itself.  Something to the effect that oil is as natural as water.  With people like him educating a very large fan base - I am struggling to stay hopeful for a planet-friendly power production solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree &#8211; we need some alternative for power generation.  However, there is that creepy feeling that the next suggestion will be more nuclear plants.  Hopefully not.<br />
On a lighter note &#8211; I heard that Rush Limbaugh said that the ocean will take care of itself.  Something to the effect that oil is as natural as water.  With people like him educating a very large fan base &#8211; I am struggling to stay hopeful for a planet-friendly power production solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oil Spills and Mine Disasters? by Paula</title>
		<link>http://buckdata.com/hp_wordpress/archives/227/comment-page-1#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 23:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buckdata.com/hp_wordpress/?p=227#comment-390</guid>
		<description>It was a beautiful planet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a beautiful planet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oil Spills and Mine Disasters? by Nancy</title>
		<link>http://buckdata.com/hp_wordpress/archives/227/comment-page-1#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 23:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buckdata.com/hp_wordpress/?p=227#comment-389</guid>
		<description>I had a similar thought with 2 such disasters happening so close in time.  It&#039;s discouraging to think about how dangerous most forms of power generation are.  Even wind turbines have their problems, the large rotor blades killing birds.  It seems that solar power is the best option.   Or some new type of power cell?  We need our scientists to get cracking!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a similar thought with 2 such disasters happening so close in time.  It&#8217;s discouraging to think about how dangerous most forms of power generation are.  Even wind turbines have their problems, the large rotor blades killing birds.  It seems that solar power is the best option.   Or some new type of power cell?  We need our scientists to get cracking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Resolutions: When I&#8217;m 65&#8230; by Resolutions: When I’m 65… &#171; buckdata</title>
		<link>http://buckdata.com/hp_wordpress/archives/179/comment-page-1#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>Resolutions: When I’m 65… &#171; buckdata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 02:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buckdata.com/hp_wordpress/?p=179#comment-316</guid>
		<description>[...] January 26th, 2010 · No Comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] January 26th, 2010 · No Comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firefighting, the Public Option by S. Buck</title>
		<link>http://buckdata.com/hp_wordpress/archives/148/comment-page-1#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Buck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buckdata.com/hp_wordpress/?p=148#comment-208</guid>
		<description>I hope it will be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope it will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firefighting, the Public Option by Margaret Murray</title>
		<link>http://buckdata.com/hp_wordpress/archives/148/comment-page-1#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buckdata.com/hp_wordpress/?p=148#comment-207</guid>
		<description>In your latest blog, you have just written THE definitive argument for single payer health care (Is this the same as the public option?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In your latest blog, you have just written THE definitive argument for single payer health care (Is this the same as the public option?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bierce is Back by Margaret</title>
		<link>http://buckdata.com/hp_wordpress/archives/124/comment-page-1#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buckdata.com/hp_wordpress/?p=124#comment-174</guid>
		<description>buckdata has taken prose to the heights with this new blog posting ruminating on technology&#039;s transformation of language. It&#039;s so gratifying to see erudite, complex ideas on a computer screen instead of the usual flat data stream (and ironic considering the content of the post). I  learned some history too along with an insider&#039;s look at that quirky literary figure, Ambrose Bierce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>buckdata has taken prose to the heights with this new blog posting ruminating on technology&#8217;s transformation of language. It&#8217;s so gratifying to see erudite, complex ideas on a computer screen instead of the usual flat data stream (and ironic considering the content of the post). I  learned some history too along with an insider&#8217;s look at that quirky literary figure, Ambrose Bierce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Legacy of Torture: What would Main Street do? by Iris</title>
		<link>http://buckdata.com/hp_wordpress/archives/120/comment-page-1#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Iris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 20:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buckdata.com/hp_wordpress/?p=120#comment-148</guid>
		<description>Interesting thoughts.  BUT (and there always is a but) here is the problem, that I see, with wanting to avoid publicity and not prosecuting the culprits and just putting additional controls in place:
we had controls and they should have been enough to prevent what has happened.
Lawmakers were informed and now they claim that they weren&#039;t told directly enough and even if they had been informed directly, &quot;what should we have done?&quot; so they ask, after all everything had the seal of confidentiality so we couldn&#039;t say or do anything.
- lawyers were rewarded for coming up with ridiculous opinions to give what we did the flair of lawfulness.
if we just fire some or even all of the culprits, they will be still around for the next administration to bring them back into the game.
worse yet, what we saw over the last 8 years was that those who gave the administration what they wanted were rewarded - those who didn&#039;t &quot;play ball&quot; got fired.  What does this teach future government employees and those who are asked to do work for the government?  I think it is really dangerous to just sweep this all under the carpet and that is exactly what we would do.  I think that this paving the road to absolute corruption.  Because, if you tell me what you want to do, I can tell you how to get it and if we can bring in some lawyers (and there are enough), they&#039;ll certify for us, that whatever we do is legal.  So now we&#039; re free from responsibility.  After all, the ends do justify the means and if that is not enough, we don&#039;t want to embarrass this wonderful and righteous country and if that is not enough, lets just stamp everything &quot;confidential.&quot;
Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thoughts.  BUT (and there always is a but) here is the problem, that I see, with wanting to avoid publicity and not prosecuting the culprits and just putting additional controls in place:<br />
we had controls and they should have been enough to prevent what has happened.<br />
Lawmakers were informed and now they claim that they weren&#8217;t told directly enough and even if they had been informed directly, &#8220;what should we have done?&#8221; so they ask, after all everything had the seal of confidentiality so we couldn&#8217;t say or do anything.<br />
- lawyers were rewarded for coming up with ridiculous opinions to give what we did the flair of lawfulness.<br />
if we just fire some or even all of the culprits, they will be still around for the next administration to bring them back into the game.<br />
worse yet, what we saw over the last 8 years was that those who gave the administration what they wanted were rewarded &#8211; those who didn&#8217;t &#8220;play ball&#8221; got fired.  What does this teach future government employees and those who are asked to do work for the government?  I think it is really dangerous to just sweep this all under the carpet and that is exactly what we would do.  I think that this paving the road to absolute corruption.  Because, if you tell me what you want to do, I can tell you how to get it and if we can bring in some lawyers (and there are enough), they&#8217;ll certify for us, that whatever we do is legal.  So now we&#8217; re free from responsibility.  After all, the ends do justify the means and if that is not enough, we don&#8217;t want to embarrass this wonderful and righteous country and if that is not enough, lets just stamp everything &#8220;confidential.&#8221;<br />
Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Modest Banking Solution by Nancy Webb</title>
		<link>http://buckdata.com/hp_wordpress/archives/102/comment-page-1#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 19:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buckdata.com/hp_wordpress/?p=102#comment-146</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a sad state of affairs when you have to put such a disclaimer on satire!  Bucks from Buckdata, now there&#039;s a bank for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a sad state of affairs when you have to put such a disclaimer on satire!  Bucks from Buckdata, now there&#8217;s a bank for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Middle Class Becomes Twittering Class? by S. Buck</title>
		<link>http://buckdata.com/hp_wordpress/archives/73/comment-page-1#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Buck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buckdata.com/hp_wordpress/?p=73#comment-109</guid>
		<description>But who says you have to send (or receive) blather? Back during the Oakland Hills fire, I took in friends who had unexpectedly become refugees.  They asked me which route to get out of the burning hills in Montclair was safest to take. It would have been nice to have had cell phones and definite information. We had neither. (They made it out safely.) Might Twitter contacts have helped, if Twitter had been around then? I think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But who says you have to send (or receive) blather? Back during the Oakland Hills fire, I took in friends who had unexpectedly become refugees.  They asked me which route to get out of the burning hills in Montclair was safest to take. It would have been nice to have had cell phones and definite information. We had neither. (They made it out safely.) Might Twitter contacts have helped, if Twitter had been around then? I think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
